While the excluded classes may have finally decided to raise their
voices on 11th October 2014 at the national Right2Water protest in
Dublin, most people don't realise the big picture in relation to the
creation of Irish Water and the long term objective.
For
most people, the introduction of water charges is a matter of financial
concern, health concern and an end to their acceptance of cronyism and
the political agenda to appease the rich at the expense of the poor.
The
politicians have made two arguments in defense of the establishment of
Irish Water. The first is that the supply of water needs to be paid for
in these times of austerity. The second is that water is a precious
resource that needs to be managed better and conservation is a key
factor in the company's creation.
Most people know
(now) that water is already paid for. We pay € 1.2 billion each year
through motor tax and VAT primarily, as these taxes had 5% and 2%
respectively specifically apportioned to cover the cost of public
water. So the first argument that water needs to be paid for
disingenuously implies that it is not already paid for. If the amount
raised by the existing measures is unsufficient to cover the cost of
supply, then surely the simplest and cheapest way to increase the
revenue accruing to the government would be to add a half percent more
on to motor tax or VAT...?
The government has chosen
not to do that. Instead it has decided to take € 200 million (half of
the eventual cost) of public money to create a commercial entity to
collect the tax that adding 0.5% to motor tax would have done for € 0.00
The
second argument is that water conservation is apparently suddenly and
completely out of the blue, (though parties have listed it in manifestos
before now) a major issue of serious political concern (with lots of
frowning and nodding) for our politicians.
Well, if
conservation is a priority issue, I would have thought that a marketing
campaign and a schools education programme would be the first thing to
try. For € 2 million the government could have had a snappy tv and
radio campaign with Jedward and BOD and Imelda May encouraging us to
bring the dog into the bath with us, and a schools education programme
so that our children could come home from school and hassle us into
washing the car from a bucket and going to the toilet in a synchronised
conga for a group flush.
And if it didnt work, for the
same money they spent setting up a company to tax us, the government
could repeat the campaign every year for the next one hundred years...!
But
they didn't. They set up a commecial entity which will charge us for
the water we already pay the government for, and who are under NO
obligation to put ONE CENT back into infrastructure, construction or
repair in a system where we don't even cconsume 50% of the water they
supply because it is lost back into the ground (and back to the
reservoirs) through leaks.
Get it? Half the
water we are paying for we don't get and will pay for again and again,
over and over. That's like going into a restaurant and asking for a
litre of water, paying for a litre, getting half a litre and the other
half gets put into the next litre you order and pay for but only get
half a litre and so on and so on.
So if the main two
political arguments are not factual, then what is the purpose of Irish
Water? Privatisation ... of course ... but that still doesn't give the
full picture.
Irish Water won't be privatised for a few
years (we presume). Over that time the government, continue to bleat
about conservation and the need to upgrade an antiquated system, will
pour millions of euro of PUBLIC money into a massive construction
(what?? the construction industry has another government cheque book to
rape ... yes. sorry.) programme to make the Irish water supply system
attractive enough for privatisation ... because a savvy businessman
buying a second hand car will get the seller to foot the bill of service
and repair if he possibly can before haggling for the lowest possible
price.
We all know that privatisation of state
bodies is a nice little earner for the politicians who engineer it and
support. Directorships, preferential shares, no doubt they get free
whatever (in this case water ... whatever he says about his intention to
pay, you think Enda Kenny is actually going to see a bill land on his
doorstep !!??), junkets, tickets to the Champions Leagure finals,
holidays, conferences (with family in tow), Christmas hampers that would
feed a small village, invitations to dinner with Paul McGinley, and the
list goes on.
The big players like Denis O'Brien (who
wasn't a big player until Michael Lowry gave him ... GAVE HIM!!! ... a
licence to print money with ESAT), will be queueing up to bid on an
asset they know they will get at a massively discounted price, making
hundreds of millions of euro in revaluation overnight. By that time
they will have a much improved infrastructure that the Irish public will
have paid for ... NOT OUT OF THE MONEY YOU'LL PAY IN WATER CHARGES,
DON'T FORGET ... THIS WILL BE OUT OF GENERAL TAXATION! They won't need
spend on the system ... they won't have to repair any leaks that are
deemed to be your responsibility, and we'll have all the regulation we
need to protect the consumser, just like the financial regulator
protected us from predatory banking practice.
So that means that the end game is a publicly financed private monopoly on the supply of water to Irish consumers ... right?
WRONG!!
That is not even close to the big picture.
Take a company like Veolia for example. Some of you will have heard of them.
Veolia Environnement S.A. is a French
transnational company with activities in four main service and utility areas traditionally managed by public authorities –
water supply and
management,
waste management,
energy and transport services. In 2012, Veolia employed 318,376
employees in 48 countries. Its revenue in that year was recorded at
€29.4 billion (wikipedia :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veolia_Environnement)
Veolia Water (formerly is the water division of the French company Veolia Environnement and the world's largest supplier of water services.
Veolia
has water operations in 66 countries across the globe, employing 95,789
workers worldwide and serving completely or partly about 64
metropolitan areas with more than 139 million inhabitants. It is
strongest in Europe, particularly in its native France and Germany. Its
biggest competitor is Suez Environnement.
Veolia is in
the news this week (13th Oct 2014) because it has been charged with the
disposal of contaminated items from the home of the Dallas man who died
of Ebola .... that's where they rank in global services.
Why would they be interested in Ireland? Well, for a start, they're already here.
http://www.veolia.ie/
Veolia
Ireland have contracts with several county councils for water and waste
management, they operate the LUAS in Dublin, and this year bought
Dalkia, a major supplier of energy to industry.
When
the gate is opened for bidding on the government's shiny new toy Irish
Water, Veolia will be one of the first in the queue, with Denis O'Brien
not far behind.
Why would Veolia be interested in little old Ireland? ... Here's why.
THE BIG PICTURE:
According
to the Global Water Forum, set up under UNESCO (United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) and UniTwin (Unesco
Chair in Water Economics and Transboundary Water Governance), the global
outlook for (fresh) water covers four issues: the availability of the
resource, water quality, access to water supply and sanitation, and
water-related disasters.
http://www.globalwaterforum.org/2012/05/21/water-outlook-to-2050-the-oecd-calls-for-early-and-strategic-action/
Here are some key points to note:
1. Resource availability
Water demand is projected to increase by 55% globally between 2000 and 2050.
This
situation is compounded by two factors. First, the number of people
living in river basins under severe water stress is projected to reach
3.9 billion by 2050, totalling over 40% of the world’s population. In
water stressed basins, small changes in water regimes (droughts) can
have major consequences. Second, groundwaterdepletion, which more than
doubled between 1960 and 2000, may become the greatest threat to
agriculture and urban water supplies in several regions in the coming
decades.
85% of the world population lives in the driest half of the planet.
783 million people do not have access to clean water and almost 2.5 billion do not have access to adequate sanitation.
Global
population growth projections of 2–3 billion people over the next 40
years, combined with changing diets, result in a predicted increase in
food (and water) demand of 70% by 2050.
Over
half of the world population lives in urban areas, and the number of
urban dwellers grows each day. Urban areas, although better served than
rural areas, are struggling to keep up with population growth
(WHO/UNICEF, 2010).
With expected increases in
population, by 2030, food demand is predicted to increase by 50% (70% by
2050) (Bruinsma, 2009), while energy demand from hydropower and other
renewable energy resources will rise by 60% (WWAP, 2009). These issues
are interconnected – increasing agricultural output, for example, will
substantially increase both water and energy consumption, leading to
increased competition for water between water-using sectors.
Water
availability is expected to decrease in many regions. Yet future global
agricultural water consumption alone is estimated to increase by ~19%
by 2050, and will be even greater in the absence of any technological
progress or policy intervention.
Water for
irrigation and food production constitutes one of the greatest pressures
on freshwater resources. Agriculture accounts for ~70% of global
freshwater withdrawals (up to 90% in some fast-growing economies).
Economic
growth and individual wealth are shifting diets from predominantly
starch-based to meat and dairy, which require more water. Producing 1 kg
of rice, for example, requires ~3,500 L of water, 1 kg of beef ~15,000
L, and a cup of coffee ~140 L (Hoekstra and Chapagain, 2008). This
dietary shift is the greatest to impact on water consumption over the
past 30 years, and is likely to continue well into the middle of the
twenty-first century (FAO, 2006).
About 66% of Africa
is arid or semi-arid and more than 300 of the 800 million people in
sub-Saharan Africa live in a water-scarce environment – meaning that
they have less than 1,000 m3 per capita (NEPAD, 2006).
Over 90 international water agreements were drawn up to help manage shared water basins on the African continent (UNEP, 2010).
2. Water quality
The quality of surface water outside the OECD is expected to deteriorate in the coming decades.
The
consequences will be increased eutrophication, biodiversity loss and
disease. Micro-pollutants(medicines, cosmetics, cleaning agents, and
biocide residues) are an emerging concern.
3. Water supply and sanitation
Despite
tremendous efforts in the last two decades, the number of city dwellers
without access to an improved water source has increased since 1990; as
urbanisation has outpaced the development of infrastructure. More than
240 million people (most of them in rural areas) will still be without
access to an improved water source by 2050. The situation is even more
daunting given that access to an improved water source does not always mean access to safe water.
In addition, 1.4 billion people are projected to be without access to
basic sanitation in 2050, with severe consequences on health and
environment, as well as hampering water uses downstream.
4. Water-related disasters
The
number of people at risk from floodsis projected to rise from 1.2
billion today to around 1.6 billion in 2050 (nearly 20% of the world’s
population). The economic value of assets at risk is expected to be
around USD 45 trillion by 2050, a growth of over 340% from 2010.
Big Phil has gone to Europe, so he's out of the way, right?
WRONG!
The
European Parliament hasn't been a political structure for a long time
now. It is now a trading floor, controlled by corporate players in
industry and finance, with MEP's merely the traders on the floor ...
buying and selling the assets of member states to the multi-billionaire
businessmen (like Denis O'Brien) competing for shares of global asset
resources (labour, natural resources, political power...and by
extension...tax revenue).
Brussels has an entire
sub-industry of wheelers and dealers lobbying EU politicians and policy
makers on behalf of companies like Veolia, Royal Dutch Shell, BP, the
European Auto industry, Food giants like Nestle, the major banking,
finance and insurance companies that engineered the financial crisis and
the list goes on... Brussels lobby groups are at least as powerful as
the lobby groups that champion US industry in Washington.
Phil
Hogan hasn't retired to Europe, he has been sent as Ireland's trading
floor runner in the global sell-out to corporations that dwarf national
governments. And he's not negotiating for you, he's doing it for his
political buddies (all parties included), the golf-club-set, the horsey
set, the golden circle financiers like Fingleton, bankers like Drumm and
Boucher, movers like John Tierney and developers like Johnny Ronan.
IN
A WORLD WHERE WATER WILL BE THE NEW OIL, IRELAND COULD BE A COUNTRY
WEALTHY ENOUGH TO PROVIDE FREE PUBLIC SERVICES INCLUDING HEALTH,
EDUCATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT FOR IRISH PEOPLE.
We
consume 2% of our frech water resources in Ireland. If we could
harness even 5% of our resource, we could export clean fresh water
across the world, and even trade water for oil with the Arab states.
THE
CORPORATE PLAYERS KNOW THIS. THEY REALISE WHAT THE MARKET (AND
MARKETING) VALUE OF FRESH CLEAN WATER FROM IRELAND WOULD BE AS A
COMMODITY.
HOW MANY OF OUR POLITICIANS REALISE THIS? VERY FEW I WOULD THINK.
OUR
POLITICIANS WILL GIVE AWAY THIS POSSIBLE FUTURE FOR IRELAND FOR THE
PRICE OF A SIGNATURE OR A VOTE TO SECURE A VERY COMFY RETIREMENT.
We
gave away our oil when we could have been the richest country in
Europe, with free education, free healthcare, free public transport,
true social welfare and a country we could call our own.
Now we
are seeing the possibility of the give-away of our most precious
resource. The infinite supply of the highest quality, soon to be most
valuable commodity on the planet.
How many industries do you know
that have a raw material of unlimited, infinite supply, that is totally
free. It doesn't have to be mined. It doesn;t have to be grown. It
doesn't have to be manufactured or synthesised. It falls out of the sky
for God's sake!
THAT IS WHAT IS AT STAKE. OUR POLITICIANS
DON'T SEE IT BECAUSE THEY ARE SHORT-SIGHTED PARISH PUMP HUCKSTERS
CHASING A FREE PINT AND SEAT AT THE ALL-IRELAND FINAL.
THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS OF THE WORLD DO SEE IT. THEY SEE THE BIG PICTURE ... AND THEY PLAN THE END GAME.
We have the key to a future we can't even imagine - if we can only see it.
This may be the last chance we have to save our country from becoming Ireland Ltd.
,